Search found 7 matches
- Thu May 04, 2006 12:26 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
- Wed May 03, 2006 9:10 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
"representative powers" is not neccesarily the same as "bastions of civilized/free world"... it all depends on who you're representing. I'd say spain most likely represented european viewpoints towards native people, if to a somewhat extreme point. But hey, you could say we represent capitalism to ...
- Wed May 03, 2006 7:28 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
The only problem with preemptive striking is it could redraw the lines of battle. A neutral country might side with the country they saw as the victim. If you have a world with complex alliances set up, this could be a big problem. If, however, you assume that everyone is on a side, I don't see why ...
- Wed May 03, 2006 12:01 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
- Tue May 02, 2006 8:59 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
- Tue May 02, 2006 7:38 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433
I am sorry, both of the things you said came from the same problem. I meant that the indian economy's growth is growing faster than our own. The second derivative. I refered to the first. So it will be growing faster than ours. But its now now.
Britain's fall was more complicated than I said. BUT ...
Britain's fall was more complicated than I said. BUT ...
- Tue May 02, 2006 7:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Superpower status, is it worth it?
- Replies: 70
- Views: 1433