Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.10
Heh, Funny I scored so low on Authoritarian. I really figured I'd be more to the left, then -4 :/
windhound wrote:as far as the 'mother' question, I think it depends on the definition of homemaker. I'm thinking 'wash dishes, clean cloths, make food' over a career
if you agree with that then I think yer a tad narrow minded, maybe a century behind, but you're fully entitted to that
however, kids should always come before almost anything. that goes for mum and dad wink.gif
if you are too busy to spend time with yer son / daughter you should have thought more before creating a life thats wholely dependant on you.. just my thoughts though
and, er, if the purpose of school isnt to help people attain jobs, what is it good for?
Dicipline should be the parent's job. Socializing with peers? sure. but is that really the primary?
"What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us."
seems silly, but then again, if a corperation is doing well they'll likely to use their extra capitol to build and hire more people, ultimatly enabling the company to make more money. *shrug*
"The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders."
we looked at this in econ.. in many cases this is true. should it be this way? no, I dont really think so. but is it? yeah..
my two cents
Really, it doesn't matter who stays at home and takes care of the kids as long as its done. Statically, children are closer to their mothers than fathers. Also, regardless of the time, in a marriage, the male is still responsible for the entire families welfare. That means bringing in the monies, so that his wife doesn't have to. Though, there is no reason why she can't get a job.