Zephyrus wrote: So, hawk on par with indy, if not possibly greater again?
????????????
He means, that using a hawk strat is now (Or still) better then using an indy strat...
Ahem!
1 Deep Thought (#34) 24,812 $538,835,453 *POLICE* Otter Southsward 2
And considering my max NW (and total potential NW at round end) on that account was $1,066,000,000 roughly...
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
Ah, I see. Then again, this is Devari we're talking about, not your average player... Considering our player base, Devari could probably run a poor strat and have a decent chance.
Empires: WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ? Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
Zephyrus wrote: So, hawk on par with indy, if not possibly greater again?
????????????
He means, that using a hawk strat is now (Or still) better then using an indy strat...
Thanks for the explenation (sp?) Rudderail.
I was just running a basic a bit of everything strat and then I noticed that my hawks were weak so I decided to demolish some things and strenghten my hawks.
Zephyrus wrote: So, hawk on par with indy, if not possibly greater again?
????????????
He means, that using a hawk strat is now (Or still) better then using an indy strat...
Thanks for the explenation (sp?) Rudderail.
I was just running a basic a bit of everything strat and then I noticed that my hawks were weak so I decided to demolish some things and strenghten my hawks.
dont ferget i was helping you before i was allowed my own account. *laughs*
Yes. That "helping" invovled asttacking me a bunch in cog last round.