New Unit Addition

Post bugs or suggestions to the game here. Or discuss development topics.
User avatar
Corban
Forum Maniac
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by Corban »

Here is my idea for a new unit in the game.

The new unit would be a Siege Engine, its attack power and defence (would be 0 alone) but for every siege engine you have one guards towers defence would be ignored. Now we could make this be automatically added in or make it an option next to send all. Now if we added siege engines I would suggest making guards more powerful (also calling the battlements, walls, or something of that would better fit the game with the changes) and increasing their power by something like x2 or x5 what it is now.
So what do you all think of my idea(s)?

p.s. It would be built from the barracks and start at 0% of the current production rate. Also as expected it would take a long time to build (say 1 Siege engine would be build for every hundred otters or so.

p.s.s. Another option would be making another building specifically for building siege engines.
Formerly LordBrockFreak
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Corban/
"We're closer now than we've ever been to finishing." ~The Beatles
User avatar
Ruddertail
Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
Contact:

Post by Ruddertail »

Hmm. Sounds interesting. This would make guards more useful, while at the same time not making guard massing a totally dominating strat, since somone with a large number of seige engines could smash right through your defenses.
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
User avatar
Slasher
The FAF Forums SMEGHEAD!!! lol
Posts: 2635
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: http://florida4us.com/
Contact:

Post by Slasher »

good idea but wheres the redwall relation?
I do not have a signature, you must be imagining

http://florida4us.com/

Image
User avatar
Corban
Forum Maniac
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by Corban »

Slasher wrote: good idea but wheres the redwall relation?
Siege Engines were an essential part of medieval warfare off which the battles of redwall were based. Also if you remember the catapult used in the book mossflower was a type of siege engine. Though the types I'm mainly thinking of are battering rams (see Martin the Warrior) and siege ladders (Helms Deep Style).
Formerly LordBrockFreak
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Corban/
"We're closer now than we've ever been to finishing." ~The Beatles
User avatar
Nohc
Beware of Former Fangirls
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm

Post by Nohc »

Yould just generically call it "Seige Weapons."

I think your specs are a little off, but the idea is cool... we could try using it for a round of BFR or a special round and see how it works. I think making them have no upkeep and make it so that they can't be murdered would be cool too. That way you could just keep them lying around... of course you'd lose some when you fought someone with towers.
User avatar
Devari
Mr. -1
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:02 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Devari »

So, essentially, make towers a viable middle to end of round strategy, and then bring in siege weapons to combat that.

Interesting, to say the least...
If you go down to the woods today, you better not go alone
It's a lovely day in the woods today, but safer to stay at home
BECAUSE EVIL FREEN IS KILLING ALL THE TEDDY BEARS AT THEIR PICNIC
User avatar
Corban
Forum Maniac
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by Corban »

Nohc wrote: Yould just generically call it "Seige Weapons.".
Well Siege Engine is the correct term if I understand right, but thats the basic idea.

edit: Definition for Siege Engines: "large machines designed to aid an army in battle, usually during the siege of a castle. Examples include catapults, ballistia, and battering rams. Such machines are typically very large and heavy, slow to move, and take many days to build. However, to destroy such a beast is a hard task. Catapults and ballistia are usually out of range for any archer armed with a flaming arrow to hit, and battering rams are usually too heavily armored."
Formerly LordBrockFreak
http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Corban/
"We're closer now than we've ever been to finishing." ~The Beatles
User avatar
Fresh Water Fighters
Legendary River Dog
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Thialand (But I come form New Zealand)

Post by Fresh Water Fighters »

Wow that would be cool.
Now i have an idea for a new strat....
More ways to win!
User avatar
Nohc
Beware of Former Fangirls
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:36 pm

Post by Nohc »

Corban wrote:
Nohc wrote: Yould just generically call it "Seige Weapons.".
Well Siege Engine is the correct term if I understand right, but thats the basic idea.

edit: Definition for Siege Engines: "large machines designed to aid an army in battle, usually during the siege of a castle. Examples include catapults, ballistia, and battering rams. Such machines are typically very large and heavy, slow to move, and take many days to build. However, to destroy such a beast is a hard task. Catapults and ballistia are usually out of range for any archer armed with a flaming arrow to hit, and battering rams are usually too heavily armored."
Yes, "Siege Engines" does sound better.
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

sounds better? engines remind me of well.. engines... but sure, let's go with that...
Image
Image
ohmyjapan16
Sir Devari's Squire
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:15 am

Post by ohmyjapan16 »

I like the idea. But I would say more than one siege engine for a guard tower, because then if you had 10,000 engines, you'd be fine. Or you could price them very highly on the BM.
It ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!
User avatar
Fresh Water Fighters
Legendary River Dog
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Thialand (But I come form New Zealand)

Post by Fresh Water Fighters »

BM= Black Market
Right?
Well it is called Bazzar right now...
Anyways...
Didn't we talk about a 5th unit once?
Werent we going to call it a blester or something?
User avatar
Ruddertail
Promi Diplomacy ate my homework...
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:39 pm
Location: Chances are, playing FAF.
Contact:

Post by Ruddertail »

Ballista. (One "l" or two?) What the hay is a blester?
Empires:
WOA: Attila the Hun(#13)
BFR: ?
Founder and Leader of Hungry Huns (HH)
User avatar
Kyrodo
Rabbit
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 am
Contact:

Post by Kyrodo »

I'm pretty sure it's 2 :rolleyes: (blester... sounds like a disease or something...)
Image
Image
User avatar
Slasher
The FAF Forums SMEGHEAD!!! lol
Posts: 2635
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: http://florida4us.com/
Contact:

Post by Slasher »

Though I like the idea won't thins make the game easier for certian people?
I do not have a signature, you must be imagining

http://florida4us.com/

Image
Post Reply
  • Members connected in real time

    🔒 Close the panel of connected members